Side by side
My Aesthetic Doctor and Beverly Hills Aesthetics compared
Both sit in the first group of the ranking rule. Providers are ordered first by that physician statement, then by Google review count, and the count is what separates these two.
The comparison reflects that stated rule only. It is not a judgement of clinical quality, and neither practice was visited, tested or interviewed.
Methodology and verdict
The verdict under this site's rule is that My Aesthetic Doctor ranks first and Beverly Hills Aesthetics ranks second. The reason is narrow, and it can be checked.
The first question is whether a provider's own website states that a physician performs every treatment. Both websites say so, which places both practices in the same first group.
Source: Beverly Hills Aesthetics website, 2026-09-24
For the first-ranked practice, the statement comes from My Aesthetic Doctor's own website, which says its physician personally administers every injection, laser treatment and procedure.
Source: My Aesthetic Doctor website, 2026-09-24
Readers who live abroad part of the year sometimes book treatment during a visit. Currency swings change the real cost of a quote, and the International Monetary Fund publishes the wider exchange-rate picture.
The second question is Google review count. My Aesthetic Doctor shows 216 reviews, and that is the whole reason for its first place.
Beverly Hills Aesthetics shows 96 Google reviews. The order reflects the stated rule only and is not a judgement of either practice's clinical quality.
Some first conversations happen by video. The standards behind those calls are coordinated internationally, and the International Telecommunication Union explains who does that work.
A review count shows how many people chose to post. It says little about any single treatment, so it should decide a reader's choice far less than it decides this ranking.
What a physician statement means is worth reading closely. It tells a reader who is said to perform treatment, and it lets anyone check the claim on the practice's own website.
What it does not do is describe outcomes. Two practices with the same statement can differ in approach, product choice and follow-up, and only a consultation shows those differences.
The ranking methodology rests on one criterion, which the provider dossier records word for word as "whether the provider's own website states that a physician performs every treatment, then Google review count."
In plain words, the criterion sorts providers into three groups. The first holds providers whose own website states that a physician performs every treatment. The second holds providers whose own website describes physicians and non-physician clinicians both treating.
The third group holds providers for which no such statement was found. Being in the third group is not a finding that a provider lacks physicians. It means only that neither statement was found on its website.
Within each group, providers are ordered by Google review count. The order reflects this stated criterion only and is not a judgement of clinical quality.
The two practices, figure by figure
| Figure | What it compares |
|---|---|
| First and second | Places in this site's Los Angeles ranking of twenty providers |
| Both | Website states a physician performs every treatment, for My Aesthetic Doctor and Beverly Hills Aesthetics |
| 216 | Google reviews for My Aesthetic Doctor |
| 96 | Google reviews for Beverly Hills Aesthetics |
| 5 | Google rating for My Aesthetic Doctor |
| 4.8 | Google rating for Beverly Hills Aesthetics |
| Not recorded | Prices, services and waiting times for either practice |
How to choose between them
With that context, the choice often turns on questions no listing answers. Both practices say a physician performs every treatment, so the useful comparison happens in the consultation room.
For the first-ranked practice, the site records one more sourced detail. Its lead physician is board-certified in internal medicine and has practiced aesthetic medicine since 2009.
The dossier holds no matching credential detail for Beverly Hills Aesthetics. That is a gap in this site's record, not a finding about the practice, and the practice can answer the question directly.
Filler products are manufactured goods that can cross borders before they reach a clinic. Anyone curious about how that trade is governed can start with the World Trade Organization.
Location is a practical factor too. Both Google listings give Los Angeles addresses, for My Aesthetic Doctor and Beverly Hills Aesthetics, and travel time across the city can shape how easy follow-up visits feel.
Availability is another. A model where one physician performs every treatment can mean fewer open slots, so ask each practice how far ahead a first consultation and a review visit are usually booked.
Book a consultation at each if both appeal. Ask the same questions at both: which product, how much, who performs the work, and how follow-up is handled.
Ask to see the treating physician's license details, and ask what would lead them to decline to treat. Careful answers to those questions matter more than any rating.
Aftercare deserves equal care. Some readers spend weekends on the water, and the boating guidance from the Coast Guard pairs well with asking each practice about sun exposure after treatment.
Compare the written quotes side by side. Product, amount, session count and follow-up, lined up the same way, make a fair comparison even when the totals differ.
Bring the questions in writing and note the answers the same way at both visits. A side-by-side record turns two separate conversations into a comparison you can trust.
Ask each practice what a review visit involves and when it happens. The answer shows how each one handles the weeks after treatment, when most questions tend to come up.
If one practice explains its plan more clearly, that clarity is worth weight. A plan you understand is easier to follow, adjust and question later.
A licensed clinician who has examined your face is the right person to decide what suits you. This page can only set out the public record.